This page gives users examples of the types of evidence that may support audit work in AuditFlow OS.
It helps users understand what good evidence looks like, how evidence should be linked to audit records and findings, and how to assess whether evidence is complete enough to support an audit conclusion.
This page does not contain real evidence. Replace examples with organisation-specific evidence when using the template.
The purpose of this page is to provide practical examples of audit evidence that can be collected, reviewed, and linked to audits, findings, controls, and actions.
Use this page to support:
Good audit evidence should be:
| Evidence Quality | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Relevant | Directly supports the audit objective, control, finding, or conclusion |
| Current | Reflects the period or process being reviewed |
| Complete | Shows enough detail to support the conclusion |
| Traceable | Can be linked back to the audit, control, finding, or action |
| Reliable | Comes from an appropriate source or system |
| Reviewable | Can be understood by another reviewer without excessive explanation |
Evidence should answer this question: